How the Winter Olympics Showed Up in Emoji Interest Data
Published July 31, 2026 · Wikipedia pageview data, Wikimedia REST API
During February 2026 — the month the Winter Olympics were held in Milan-Cortina — Wikipedia interest in five winter-sport emoji spiked well above their typical monthly average. The curling stone emoji (🥌) saw the largest jump: its related Wikipedia article received 35 times its usual monthly traffic. Ice hockey (🏒), ice skating (⛸️), skiing (🎿), and sledding (🛷) all spiked the same month.
February 2026 vs. typical month, by multiplier
Multiplier = February 2026 pageviews ÷ the article's average pageviews across every other month in our ~2.5-year dataset (2024-01 through 2026-06).
The raw numbers
| Emoji | Feb 2026 views | Typical month | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥌 Curling Stone | 1,125,340 | 31,948 | 35.2× |
| 🏒 Ice Hockey | 231,886 | 54,444 | 4.3× |
| ⛸️ Ice Skate | 10,010 | 3,123 | 3.2× |
| 🎿 Skis | 8,417 | 3,833 | 2.2× |
| 🛷 Sled | 7,449 | 4,568 | 1.6× |
A second story in the same month: Lunar New Year
February 2026 wasn't just the Olympics. Lunar New Year fell on February 17, 2026, and the red envelope emoji (🧧) — the digital stand-in for the cash gifts (hongbao) exchanged during the holiday — saw its Wikipedia article traffic jump to 49,419 views, 3.0× its typical month. Different cause, same calendar page: two real-world events, two independent emoji-relevant traffic spikes, in the same 28 days.
Methodology — and what we left out
Data comes from the Wikimedia REST API's monthly pageview counts for each emoji's mapped Wikipedia article, the same pipeline that powers the trend sparklines on individual emoji pages. This measures public interest in the concept an emoji represents, via Wikipedia readership — it is a different signal from on-site copy behavior, and we're not claiming it proves people copied these emoji more often, only that interest in the topic clearly moved.
The same February 2026 scan surfaced two other emoji with large percentage swings — Gemini and Star — that we deliberately left out of this piece. Both map to Wikipedia articles whose traffic is dominated by things that have nothing to do with emoji (a zodiac sign that shares a name with a well-known AI product; general astronomy), so we can't honestly attribute their movement to Olympics- or emoji-related interest. A number we can't explain isn't a finding.
Share this report
Charts and tables are free to embed — just link back to this page. Data is available under CC-BY-SA 4.0 (Wikimedia). For journalists and newsletter writers, contact us for the raw month-by-month figures.